Displaying 31 - 40 of 71.
The author criticizes claims made by religious scholars that only those with expertise should discuss Islam, stating that Islam is greater than those who pursue its study.
The second of a two-part article arguing that sharī‘ah must adapt to the needs of the society it serves in order to actually administer justice.
The author argues that Sharī‘ah is meant to serve people in administering justice, not the other way around.
Al-Bannā is against the idea that judicial rulings are absolutely correct because such saying violates the principle of freedom of expression.
Al-Bannā supports Dr Zaynab Radwān’s calls for equality between men and women in testimony and for non-Muslims wives to inherit from their Muslim husbands.
On a program screened on Egyptian TV, Shaykh Khālid al-Jindī has threatened to slaughter the author for opposing his controversial fatwás.
Al-Bannā continues to refute the argument that Islam abrogates earlier religions, and refutes the possible “specious arguments” that could be used against his own assertions.
Jamāl al-Bannā believes that conflicts among religions are not due to differences in religions but rather to religious institutions misusing religions.
Jamāl al-Bannā calls for encouraging translations from foreign languages in order to be able to cope with the world’s most updated knowledge.
Backwardness and reactionism are increasing in the Islamic world.

Pages

Subscribe to