Displaying 11 - 20 of 27.
The article is based on a response made by the author, Muntasir al-Zayyāt, to an article authored by the liberal intellectual Tarek Heggy entitled, ‘Law Kuntu Qibtīya’ [If I Were a Copt]. Heggy believes that the state unjustly spends tax money, partially paid by Copts, and allocates it for building...
Al-Zayyāt, the author, talks about the philosophies of Islamic movements who have adopted violent approaches when dealing with the authorities.
Muntaṣir al-Zayyāt, the author, talks about reasons and targets of violence-based Islamic movements in the Islamic world.
The author of the article, the lawyer for the Muslim Brotherhood, justifies the outlawed group’s resort to violence.
This article suggests that clinging to Islām is the solution to all our problems and that the U.S. and Israel are fighting Islamic movements under the cloak of their war on terrorism.
The author expresses his view about the media during Ramadān. He says that television must concern itself more with religious and moral programs and series that present Islamic history, rather than trivial series and shows which keep the audience away from moral and spiritual values.
Muntasir al-Ziyāt discusses the events and political context preceding the assassination of al-Sadāt and describes the motives of the perpetrator, Khālid Ahmad Shawqī al- ‘Islāmboulī.
Muntasir al-Zayyāt, head of the Freedoms Committee at the Bar Association, analyzes the latest video tape sent by Ayman al-Zawāhirī where he encourages the Islamic resistance in Lebanon. He also touches on the latest developments in the Middle East.
In this article the author quotes Muftī ‘Alī Jum‘a and his views that Egypt is a liberal state, not a religious one.
The author criticizes the Minister of Endowment’s decisions to nationalize the call to prayer, optional prayers during Ramadān and religious discourse.

Pages

Subscribe to