Date of source: Wednesday, September 13, 2006
The author defends Christians against the accusation of
political duality.
Date of source: Wednesday, August 16, 2006
The article responds to the questions regarding the Pope’s attitude towards the dissident
Maximus.
Date of source: Thursday, July 27, 2006
The Shūrá Council discussed two electoral systems,
seeking to find a suitable system that can be implemented in Egypt
Date of source: Monday, May 29, 2006
Dr.
Bibāwī
argues for the cancellation of the religious data entry on official documents in Egypt.
Date of source: Wednesday, May 17, 2006
The author delves into
history to show that Julius Caesar was responsible for the
fire at the library of Alexandria, and not Amr Ibn al-
Ās as some Copts say.
Date of source: Wednesday, May 3, 2006
The author criticizes
Copts’ negative political culture as they do not participate in
elections, urging them to become politically
active for the good of their country and themselves.
Date of source: Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Rumors are going around concerning the links between Pope
Shenouda and the expatriate
Copts according to the author. He expresses his opinion on the matter and gives
evidence in support of his
belief.
Date of source: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
The author says the Egyptian church
did not deliberately reject the
court ruling allowing divorced Christians to get married for a second time, but did
so through its will to
observe Christian teachings.
Date of source: Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Dr. Nabīl Louqā Bibāwī argues that establishing religion-based parties is unconstitutional in Egypt, since article 5 of the Egyptian constitution states, "the political system of the Arab Republic of Egypt is a multiparty one, within the framework of the basic elements and principles of Egyptian...
Date of source: Thursday, December 29, 2005
Dr. Nabīl Louqā Bibāwī welcomes President Mubārak’s recent decision to entrust provincial governors with making church-related decisions. Under the previous Hamayouni Decree, an Ottoman law going back to 1856, the head of state’s personal approval was required for the simplest of church repairs.