Displaying 871 - 880 of 1447.
Egypt was right when it called for collective action against terrorism under the umbrella of an international conference. Egypt was victimized by terrorism and was looking for the collective good when it launched that call. But it was responded to with negligence and selfishness, until terrorism...
There are two different types of terrorism, the one of Bin Lādin that depends on terrorizing people and targeting them with violence all across the globe, and the other of George Bush which plays on the chords of fear depending on the notion of constructive anarchism.
The one question that comes to mind for someone who is not looking closely at the terrorism phenomenon, which has become globalized after the September 11 events, is: why would young people of different social classes commit suicide?
In the light of the sad London blasts, one is sad for the British losses, as well as the Muslim losses. Whenever wise people promote the good core of Islam, unwise people destroy what was done.
The simultaneous assassination of Ambassador Īhāb al-Sharīf and the London blasts renewed the need for implementing President Mubārak’s call for an international conference on terrorism.
The civilized world has condemned July 7’s brutal attack on London. In addition to the condemnation, the Presidents of Middle Eastern and Islamic states sent supportive and sympathetic messages to their old historical friend, Britain
“We have fulfilled our promise and carried out our blessed military raid in Britain after our mujāhidīn exerted strenuous efforts over a long period of time to ensure the success of the raid.” [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4660391.stm] With these words an Islamist group, purporting to be al-Qā‘ida...
The assassination of Ambassador Īhāb al-Sharīf was followed by strange announcements assuring that the Egyptian presence in Iraq was to support the Arab representation in Baghdad. Thus the assassination will not divert the Egyptian attention away from its quest.
The Jamā‘a al-Islāmīya said in their press statement in reaction to the assassination of Īhāb al-Sharīf, that the Zarqāwī group accuses others of takfir [unbelief]. They even see other Islamic groups as heretics without a substantial Islamic backing
Thus there is no religious backing for the abduction or the killing of Egyptian Ambassador خhāb al-Sharīf in Baghdad. He was not responsible for the Iraqi misfortunes or occupation, and he did not kill a single Iraqi. Thus revenge here is groundless.

Pages

Subscribe to