The article is a comment on Tareq Al-Bishri’s article in which he compared the attitude of the State towards Al-Nabaa crisis and the crisis caused by the publication of the "Banquet for Seaweed." The author believes that Christians have the right to get angry and to express that anger by all lawful means. He added that Al-Bishri’s article ramified the main case when it mentioned that Copts had become a political power and that the relationship between the state and the church is that between two rival parties and that the church was no longer a church [in the religious sense] but rather an "ecclesiastical institution."